<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ICCA Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org</link>
    <description>ICCA Articles</description>
    <dc:creator>ICCA</dc:creator>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Hwang, "Defining the Indefinable: Practical Problems of Confidentiality in Arbitration", 26(5) Journal of International Arbitration, (2009) pp. 609-645 (with co-author Katie Chung)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_123</link>
      <description>This article examines both the theory and the global practice (in both national legislation and arbitration rules) with regard to confidentiality in arbitration.</description>
      <category>defining</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>indefinable</category>
      <category>practical</category>
      <category>problems</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>confidentiality</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>pp</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>katie</category>
      <category>chung</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T05:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Hwang, "Survey of South East Asian Nations on the Application of the New York Convention", 25(6) Journal of International Arbitration, (2008), pp 873-892 (with co-author Shaun Lee)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_122</link>
      <description>This article surveys arbitration legislation in South East Asian nations, examining court intervention in setting aside proceedings and in the application of Article V of the New York Convention in enforcement proceedings.</description>
      <category>survey</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>south</category>
      <category>east</category>
      <category>asian</category>
      <category>nations</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>application</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>pp</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>shaun</category>
      <category>lee</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_122</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T05:23:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "International Arbitration, a Contemporary Perspective" (Lecture delivered in Bologna, 5 June 2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_121</link>
      <description>This article examines some of the general features of the current international arbitration system.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>contemporary</category>
      <category>perspective</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>delivered</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>bologna</category>
      <category>june</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_121</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T04:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pierre Lalive "Absolute Finality of Arbitral Awards ?"in Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliaçao-Año I-2008 (Associação Portuguesa de Arbiatragem, Ed. Almedina, Coimbra, 2009), pp. 109-127.</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_120</link>
      <description>In this article, Professor Lalive examines the competing values of finality and correctness of arbitral awards, referring to concrete commercial cases and to the ICSID system.</description>
      <category>pierre</category>
      <category>lalive</category>
      <category>absolute</category>
      <category>finality</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>system</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pierre_Lalive</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T04:52:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Treaty Obligations and National Law: Emerging Conflicts in International Arbitration" in 58 Hastings Law Review 251 (2006) (with co-author Alexander Yanos)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_119</link>
      <description>This examination of recent United States case law highlights emerging tensions between treaty obligations and national law in the recognition of arbitral awards.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>treaty</category>
      <category>obligations</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>national</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>emerging</category>
      <category>conflicts</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>hastings</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>alexander</category>
      <category>yanos</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_119</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Respecting the New York Convention" in 18 (2) ICC Court of Arbitration Bulletin 65 (2007)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_118</link>
      <description>This article examines the contours of national respect for the New York Convention by examining recent divergent strands of case law.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>respecting</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>icc</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>bulletin</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_118</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:39:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Comments to the ruling of the Cairo Court of Appeals, 7th Commercial Circuit (12/B), hearing of 9th June 2009" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_117</link>
      <description>This is a case note examining a recent judgment of the Cairo Court of Appeals in setting aside proceedings.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>comments</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>ruling</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>cairo</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>appeals</category>
      <category>th</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>circuit</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>hearing</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>th</category>
      <category>june</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_117</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Setting aside an arbitral award with a reference to recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_116</link>
      <description>This is an overview of the grounds for setting aside in Art. 829 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>setting</category>
      <category>aside</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>award</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>reference</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>recent</category>
      <category>judgments</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>cassation</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>forthcoming</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:17:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_116</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:17:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Italian law of arbitration" in Journal on Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_115</link>
      <description>This article provides a succinct overview of the Italian law on arbitration.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>this</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <category>provides</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>succinct</category>
      <category>overview</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_115</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Challenge of an arbitrator, with a reference to recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_114</link>
      <description>This is a brief note regarding Art. 815 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in three recent decisions of the Italian Court of Cassation.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>challenge</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>reference</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>recent</category>
      <category>judgments</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>cassation</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>forthcoming</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_114</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:10:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Procedural Default Rules Revisited" in Arbitration Insights 331 (J. Lew &amp; L. Mistels, eds. 2006)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_113</link>
      <description>This article explores three procedural aspects of arbitration practice: the use of professional guidelines, resort to national law to fill gaps and increased awareness of the need for ground rules at the start of proceedings.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>procedural</category>
      <category>default</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>revisited</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>insights</category>
      <category>j</category>
      <category>lew</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>mistels</category>
      <category>eds</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_113</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Two Faces of Progress: Fairness and Flexibility in Arbitral Procedure" in 23 Arb. Int’l 499 (2007)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_112</link>
      <description>In this article, the author examines two themes in the legal framework of arbitration -- arbitrator discretion and constraint  -- through the prism of Sections 34 and 68 of the English Arbitration Act 1996.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>two</category>
      <category>faces</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>progress</category>
      <category>fairness</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>flexibility</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>procedure</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arb</category>
      <category>int</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>prism</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>sections</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>english</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>act</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_112</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "The Procedural Soft Law of International Arbitration: Non-Governmental Instruments" in Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration 141 (L. Mistelis &amp; J. Lew, eds. 2006)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_111</link>
      <description>This book chapter explores the guidelines of professional groups and non-governmental organizations related to evidence, conflicts of interest, ethics and the organization of arbitral proceedings -- the "soft law" of international arbitration.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>procedural</category>
      <category>soft</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>non</category>
      <category>governmental</category>
      <category>instruments</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>soft</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:58:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_111</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T02:58:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Non-signatories and International Contracts: An Arbitrator’s Dilemma" in Multiple Party Actions in International Arbitration 3 (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_110</link>
      <description>This article addresses the issue of joining non-signatories to an arbitration, in which case arbitrators often look to theories related to implied consent and lack of corporate personality.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>non</category>
      <category>signatories</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>contracts</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>dilemma</category>
      <category>multiple</category>
      <category>party</category>
      <category>actions</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>joining</category>
      <category>non</category>
      <category>signatories</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_110</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T01:58:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "La giustizia paralizzata: abbozzo di una terapia" in 2 Carriere &amp; Professioni Giustizia 214 (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_109</link>
      <description>The excessive length of proceedings before the Italian courts and some theoretical and practical suggestions on solving this chronic problem are the subject matter of this article.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>la</category>
      <category>giustizia</category>
      <category>paralizzata</category>
      <category>abbozzo</category>
      <category>di</category>
      <category>una</category>
      <category>terapia</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>carriere</category>
      <category>professioni</category>
      <category>giustizia</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>proceedings</category>
      <category>before</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>courts</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_109</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T01:55:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David A.R. Williams QC:, "Arbitration and Dispute Resolution" in New Zealand Law Review 99 (2009) (with co-author Amokura Kawharu)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_108</link>
      <description>This review of arbitration topics in New Zealand addresses the Arbitration Amendment Act 2007 and the changes it has made, the newly introduced appropriately restrictive test to be applied when special leave is sought in relation to questions of law arising out of an award and the growing importance for New Zealand of investment treaty arbitration.</description>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>amendment</category>
      <category>act</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>zealand</category>
      <category>investment</category>
      <category>treaty</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>david</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>r</category>
      <category>williams</category>
      <category>qc</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>dispute</category>
      <category>resolution</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_108</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Williams,</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T01:48:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "Past, Present, and Future Perspectives of Arbitration" in 25 Arbitration International 293 (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_107</link>
      <description>This article is an adaptation of the Patron's Address at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in October 2008, and includes thoughts on past and future aspects of international arbitration practice from the perspective of the arbitrator.</description>
      <category>past</category>
      <category>present</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>perspectives</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>adaptation</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>patron</category>
      <category>institute</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>conference</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>kuala</category>
      <category>lumpur</category>
      <category>malaysia</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_107</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-20T13:02:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "L’arbitrato nella composizione delle trust disputes: un valore aggiunto" in 5 Notariato 520 (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_106</link>
      <description>This article examines the role of arbitration in the implementation of trusts and the effect of arbitration clauses in trust deeds on third party beneficiaries.</description>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>arbitrato</category>
      <category>nella</category>
      <category>composizione</category>
      <category>delle</category>
      <category>trust</category>
      <category>disputes</category>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>notariato</category>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>clauses</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>trust</category>
      <category>deeds</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>third</category>
      <category>party</category>
      <category>beneficiaries</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_106</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-20T12:57:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Framing the Case on Quantum" in Damages in International Arbitration, 2 World Arbitration &amp; Mediation Review 59 (2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_105</link>
      <description>This address introduces some of the divergent approaches to quantum of damages in international investment law, focusing on the legality of expropriation.</description>
      <category>case</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>quantum</category>
      <category>damages</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>world</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>mediation</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:36:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_105</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-20T12:36:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pieter Sanders, "The Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules" (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_104</link>
      <description>In this article, Professor Sanders shares his personal views on the current stage of the UNCITRAL Rules revision process.</description>
      <category>pieter</category>
      <category>sanders</category>
      <category>current</category>
      <category>stage</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>uncitral</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>revision</category>
      <category>process</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter_Sanders</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-04T07:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jan Paulsson, “Unlawful Laws and the Authority of International Tribunals” (2009 Lalive Lecture, Geneva, 27 May 2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_101</link>
      <description>This lecture examines the role of national law in resolving international disputes, arguing that arbitrators have a duty to apply national law in the broadest sense, including its most fundamental norms.</description>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>unlawful</category>
      <category>laws</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>authority</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>tribunals</category>
      <category>lalive</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>geneva</category>
      <category>may</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T11:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Procedural Evolution in Business Arbitration: Three Studies in Change" in Arbitration of International Business Disputes (2006), p. 1</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_99</link>
      <description>This article examines the evolution of business arbitration in the last 50 years by examining three case studies in change: judicial review of commercial awards under national arbitration statutes; the treaty foundations of arbitral power over international investment disputes; and the norms governing the conduct of arbitral proceedings.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>three</category>
      <category>studies</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>change</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>business</category>
      <category>disputes</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_99</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-28T15:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "The Arbitrator's Jurisdiction to Determine Jurisdiction" in 13 ICCA Congress Series (2006) p. 55</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_98</link>
      <description>This article was first delivered as a lecture at the ICCA Congress in Montreal in 2006 and takes a fresh look at the doctrine of kompetenz-kompetenz.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>jurisdiction</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>determine</category>
      <category>jurisdiction</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>congress</category>
      <category>series</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:30:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_98</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-28T15:30:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Arbitration's Protean Nature: The Value of Rules and the Risks of Discretion", in 19(5) Mealey's International Arbitration Report (2004), p. 1 (adapted from Freshfields Lecture, London, December 2002)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_97</link>
      <description>This lecture suggests that the absence of specific procedural protocols in international arbitration practice may damage the legitimacy of the dispute resolution process.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>value</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>risks</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>discretion</category>
      <category>mealey</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>report</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_97</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-28T15:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Rules and Standards in Private International Law", 73 Arbitration (2007) p. 441</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_96</link>
      <description>This review of the 14th edition of "Dicey, Morris and Collins, The Conflict of Laws" (edited bySir Lawrence Collins, Gen. Ed.), concludes that this classic work remains the gold standard in texts on conflicts of laws.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>standards</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>private</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_96</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-28T15:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Arbitrability and Tax" in Mistelis, L. &amp; Brekoulakis, S. (eds), Arbitrability: International &amp; Comparative Perspectives (2009) p. 179</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_95</link>
      <description>This article examines the arbitrability of tax measures in the context of bilateral investment treaties, and seeks to distinguish legitimate from illegitimate taxes.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>arbitrability</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>tax</category>
      <category>mistelis</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>brekoulakis</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>comparative</category>
      <category>perspectives</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_95</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-28T15:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yves Fortier, "Investment Protection and the Rule of Law: Change or Decline" (lecture delivered at British Institute of International and Comparative Law 50th Anniversary Event Series, London, 17 March 2009).</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_94</link>
      <description>Thoughts on international investment protection - past, present and future, and the rule of law.</description>
      <category>investment</category>
      <category>protection</category>
      <category>rule</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>yves</category>
      <category>fortier</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>past</category>
      <category>present</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>rule</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>publications</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_94</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yves_Fortier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-09T12:02:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jan Paulsson, “El orden público como criterio para negar el reconocimiento y la ejecución de laudos arbitrales” in El Arbitraje Comercial Internacional Estudio de la Convención de Nueva York con motivo de su 50º aniversario (G.S. Tawil and E. Zuleta, eds. 2008) p. 609</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_93</link>
      <description>El orden público como criterio para negar el reconocimiento y la ejecución de laudos arbitrales...</description>
      <category>el</category>
      <category>arbitraje</category>
      <category>comercial</category>
      <category>internacional</category>
      <category>estudio</category>
      <category>de</category>
      <category>la</category>
      <category>convenci</category>
      <category>n</category>
      <category>de</category>
      <category>nueva</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>aniversario</category>
      <category>mr</category>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_93</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-28T03:52:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pierre Lalive, “Du courage dans l'arbitrage international”, Mélanges en l'honneur de François Knoepfler, Bâle, Helbing and Lichtenhahn, pp. 157-160 (Bonhet/Wessner eds., 2005)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_92</link>
      <description>This article is an ode to Francois Knoepfler, and contains some reflections on courage in international arbitration.</description>
      <category>p</category>
      <category>lalive</category>
      <category>du</category>
      <category>courage</category>
      <category>dans</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>arbitrage</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>bonhet</category>
      <category>wessner</category>
      <category>m</category>
      <category>langes</category>
      <category>en</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>honneur</category>
      <category>de</category>
      <category>fran</category>
      <category>ois</category>
      <category>knoepfler</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>le</category>
      <category>helbing</category>
      <category>lichtenhahn</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_92</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pierre_Lalive</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-15T18:25:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler and Victor Bonnin, “Arbitrators as Conciliators: A Statistical Study of the Relation between an Arbitrator’s Role and Legal Background” in 18(2) ICC Bulletin (2008); also available in ICC DRL, see http://www.iccdrl.com (2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_91</link>
      <description>This article sets out whether the legal background of an arbitrator plays a role in his or her inclination to intervene to encourage settlement. It notes that the practice of courts in different jurisdictions varies significantly in this respect.</description>
      <category>kaufmann</category>
      <category>kohler</category>
      <category>bonnin</category>
      <category>v</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>as</category>
      <category>conciliators</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>statistical</category>
      <category>study</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>relation</category>
      <category>between</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>role</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>legal</category>
      <category>background</category>
      <category>icc</category>
      <category>bulletin</category>
      <category>vol</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_91</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gabrielle_Kaufmann_Kohler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T06:27:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

