<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ICCA Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org</link>
    <description>ICCA Articles</description>
    <dc:creator>ICCA</dc:creator>
    <item>
      <title>Yves Fortier, "La nouvelle loi française sur l’arbitrage : vues d’Outre-Atlantique" (address delivered to Association Française de l'Arbitrage, September 2011, Paris).</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_141</link>
      <description>In this paper, Canadian arbitrator Yves Fortier discusses the 2011 amendments to French arbitration legislation, which has been characterised as "one of the most arbitration-friendly pieces of legislation conceivable".</description>
      <category>yves</category>
      <category>fortier</category>
      <category>la</category>
      <category>nouvelle</category>
      <category>loi</category>
      <category>fran</category>
      <category>aise</category>
      <category>sur</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>arbitrage</category>
      <category>vues</category>
      <category>d</category>
      <category>outre</category>
      <category>atlantique</category>
      <category>address</category>
      <category>delivered</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>association</category>
      <category>fran</category>
      <category>aise</category>
      <category>de</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>arbitrage</category>
      <category>september</category>
      <category>paris</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>publications</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yves_Fortier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T13:28:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Hwang (with co-author Kevin Lim), "Corruption in Arbitration - Law and Reality" (expanded version of Herbert Smith-SMU Asian Arbitration Lecture, 4 August 2011, Singapore; forthcoming AIAJ)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_140</link>
      <description>This extensive article considers the legal and factual issues raised by corruption both in primary arbitral proceedings and arbitration-related court proceedings.</description>
      <category>michael</category>
      <category>hwang</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>kevin</category>
      <category>lim</category>
      <category>corruption</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>reality</category>
      <category>expanded</category>
      <category>version</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>herbert</category>
      <category>smith</category>
      <category>smu</category>
      <category>asian</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>august</category>
      <category>singapore</category>
      <category>forthcoming</category>
      <category>aiaj</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-10T05:07:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel (with co-authors S. Kröll and P. Nacimiento), "Germany as a Place for International and Domestic Arbitrations -- General Overview", Vol. 6(1) TDM (March 2009), republished here with kind permission from Kluwer Law and taken from the book "Arbitration in Germany" (Kluwer, 2008).</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_139</link>
      <description>This extract from the book "Arbitration in Germany: the Model Law in Practice" provides a complete overview of the legal framework, past and present practice, arbitration infrastructure and characteristic features of arbitration in Germany.</description>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>authors</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>kr</category>
      <category>ll</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>p</category>
      <category>nacimiento</category>
      <category>germany</category>
      <category>as</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>place</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>domestic</category>
      <category>arbitrations</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-09T11:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Teresa Cheng and Adrian Lai "Lessons Learned from the FG Hemisphere vs DRC and Huatianlong Case"</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_138</link>
      <description>This paper discusses the issues of state immunity applicable in Hong Kong, and the position of the state-owned enterprise (Quoyou Qiye) of the People's Republic of China.</description>
      <category>teresa</category>
      <category>cheng</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>adrian</category>
      <category>lai</category>
      <category>lessons</category>
      <category>learned</category>
      <category>from</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>fg</category>
      <category>hemisphere</category>
      <category>vs</category>
      <category>drc</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>huatianlong</category>
      <category>case</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teresa_Cheng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-09T10:47:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "Some Reflections on Dispute Settlement in Air, Space and Telecommunications Law" (contribution to  Liber Amicorum for Ulf Franke)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_137</link>
      <description>Emerging issues in air, space and telecommunications law, as well as perspectives for the future, are examined.</description>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <category>some</category>
      <category>reflections</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>dispute</category>
      <category>settlement</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>air</category>
      <category>space</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>telecommunications</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>contribution</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>liber</category>
      <category>amicorum</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>ulf</category>
      <category>franke</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>publications</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T06:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "An Arbitrator’s Perspective of  BITs and their Relation to Other International Law Obligations" (Paper given at the Conference "50 Years of Bilateral Investment Treaties – Taking Stock and Look to the Future", Frankfurt, 1 – 3 December 2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_136</link>
      <description>Professor Bockstiegel looks at the past, present and future of BITs.</description>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <category>bits</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>their</category>
      <category>relation</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>other</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>obligations</category>
      <category>paper</category>
      <category>given</category>
      <category>at</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>conference</category>
      <category>years</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>bilateral</category>
      <category>investment</category>
      <category>treaties</category>
      <category>taking</category>
      <category>stock</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>look</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>publications</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-02T06:31:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "Major Criteria for International Arbitrators in Shaping an Efficient Procedure" in "Arbitration in the Next Decade" (ICC Bulletin, Special Supplement 1999)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_135</link>
      <description>This article, drawn from a presentation made on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the ICC Court, provides a checklist for efficient arbitration.</description>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <category>major</category>
      <category>criteria</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>shaping</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>efficient</category>
      <category>procedure</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>next</category>
      <category>decade</category>
      <category>icc</category>
      <category>bulletin</category>
      <category>special</category>
      <category>supplement</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-24T01:59:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "Assumptions regarding Common Law versus Civil Law in the Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (presentation, Frankfurt, Germany, 21/22 October 2010)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_134</link>
      <description>This edited version of introductory remarks made at a conference hosted by the German Institute of Arbitration (DIS) and Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (European Branch) in October 2010 asks the question: to what extent is there a divide or a convergence between the approaches to arbitration by Common Law jurisdictions versus Civil Law jurisdictions?</description>
      <category>karl</category>
      <category>heinz</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>ckstiegel</category>
      <category>assumptions</category>
      <category>regarding</category>
      <category>common</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>versus</category>
      <category>civil</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>practice</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>presentation</category>
      <category>frankfurt</category>
      <category>germany</category>
      <category>october</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Heinz_Bockstiegel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-24T01:56:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nael G. Bunni, “The Arbitration Act 2010”, 76(4) International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, November 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_133</link>
      <description>Commenting on the new arbitration legislation that came into effect in Ireland in June 2010.</description>
      <category>nael</category>
      <category>g</category>
      <category>bunni</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>act</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>mediation</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>dispute</category>
      <category>management</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>chartered</category>
      <category>institute</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nael_Bunni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-11T05:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Albert Jan van den Berg, "Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitration", in Mahnoush Arsanjani et al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_132</link>
      <description>This article analyzes current practice regarding dissenting opinions in investment arbitrations, concluding that "investment arbitration would function better and be more credible if party-appointed arbitrators observe the principle: nemine dissentiente".</description>
      <category>albert</category>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>van</category>
      <category>den</category>
      <category>berg</category>
      <category>dissenting</category>
      <category>opinions</category>
      <category>by</category>
      <category>party</category>
      <category>appointed</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>investment</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>mahnoush</category>
      <category>arsanjani</category>
      <category>et</category>
      <category>al</category>
      <category>eds</category>
      <category>looking</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>essays</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>honor</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>michael</category>
      <category>reisman</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-06T20:06:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Piero Bernardini, "ICSID versus non-ICSID Investment Treaty Arbitration" in Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_131</link>
      <description>This article examines the reasons for investors' choice for ICSID or non-ICSID investment treaty arbitration and the differences between the two categories.</description>
      <category>piero</category>
      <category>bernardini</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>versus</category>
      <category>non</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>investment</category>
      <category>treaty</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>members</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Piero_Bernardini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-06T19:59:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>V.V. Veeder, "Is There a Need to Revise the New York Convention?" in E. Gaillard (ed.), The Review of International Arbitral Awards (Keynote Speech, IAI Forum, Dijon, 2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_130</link>
      <description>This article asks whether the New York Convention should be amended by the United Nations, concluding most emphatically not.</description>
      <category>v</category>
      <category>v</category>
      <category>veeder</category>
      <category>is</category>
      <category>there</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>need</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>revise</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>e</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>ed</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>keynote</category>
      <category>speech</category>
      <category>iai</category>
      <category>forum</category>
      <category>dijon</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:32:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_130</guid>
      <dc:creator>V_Veeder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-24T10:32:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Arbitrator Integrity: The Transient and the Permanent", in 46 San Diego Law Review, 629 (2009)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_129</link>
      <description>This article emphasises the importance of maintaining the integrity of the arbitrator, and examines ethical standards for doing so</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>integrity</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>transient</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>permanent</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>san</category>
      <category>diego</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_129</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-24T10:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jan Paulsson, "Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution" (Inaugural Lecture as holder of Michael R. Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair, University of Miami School of Law, 29 April 2010)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_128</link>
      <description>Professor Paulsson's inaugural lecture at the Miami School of Law examines "moral hazards" in the legal resolution of international disputes, with reference to certain practices of arbitrators and arbitral institutes.</description>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>moral</category>
      <category>hazard</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>dispute</category>
      <category>resolution</category>
      <category>inaugural</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>as</category>
      <category>holder</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>michael</category>
      <category>r</category>
      <category>klein</category>
      <category>distinguished</category>
      <category>scholar</category>
      <category>chair</category>
      <category>university</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>miami</category>
      <category>school</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>april</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-24T10:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Arbitrators and Accuracy" in 1(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 25 (2010)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_127</link>
      <description>The proposition of this article is that an arbitrator's primary duty is the delivery of an accurate award, resting on a reasonably ascertainable picture of reality.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>accuracy</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>dispute</category>
      <category>settlement</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_127</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-21T06:55:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jan Paulsson, "Unlawful Laws and the Authority of International Tribunals" (Lalive Lecture, Geneva, 27 May 2009), in 23(2) ICSID Review/FILJ (2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_126</link>
      <description>This article examines some of the issues that arise in applying norms of national and international law, noting the need to pay due regard to the norms of national law as a whole.</description>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>unlawful</category>
      <category>laws</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>authority</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>tribunals</category>
      <category>lalive</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>geneva</category>
      <category>may</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>filj</category>
      <category>prof</category>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:48:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-21T06:48:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Albert Jan van den Berg, "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia: Case Comment on Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, April 28, 2009", 27(2) Journal of International Arbitration, 179 (2010)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_125</link>
      <description>This article examines the Amsterdam Court of Appeal's 28 April 2009 decision granting enforcement of four arbitral awards annulled by Russian courts under the New York Convention; the author concludes that the Court of Appeal's reasoning is at odds with the New York Convention.</description>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>appeal</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>april</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>four</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>annulled</category>
      <category>by</category>
      <category>russian</category>
      <category>courts</category>
      <category>odds</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>albert</category>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>van</category>
      <category>den</category>
      <category>berg</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-21T06:42:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jan Paulsson, "Arbitration in Three Dimensions",  LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 2/2010, London School of Economics and Political Science, Law Department, published at www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/wps.htm</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_124</link>
      <description>This paper examines the philosophical basis of modern arbitration, concluding that it is a complex, three-dimensional form of pluralism, in which legal orders are not exclusively those of States and may overlap.</description>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>three</category>
      <category>dimensions</category>
      <category>lse</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>society</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>working</category>
      <category>papers</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_124</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-15T15:01:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Hwang, "Defining the Indefinable: Practical Problems of Confidentiality in Arbitration", 26(5) Journal of International Arbitration, (2009) pp. 609-645 (with co-author Katie Chung)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_123</link>
      <description>This article examines both the theory and the global practice (in both national legislation and arbitration rules) with regard to confidentiality in arbitration.</description>
      <category>defining</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>indefinable</category>
      <category>practical</category>
      <category>problems</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>confidentiality</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>pp</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>katie</category>
      <category>chung</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T05:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael Hwang, "Survey of South East Asian Nations on the Application of the New York Convention", 25(6) Journal of International Arbitration, (2008), pp 873-892 (with co-author Shaun Lee)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_122</link>
      <description>This article surveys arbitration legislation in South East Asian nations, examining court intervention in setting aside proceedings and in the application of Article V of the New York Convention in enforcement proceedings.</description>
      <category>survey</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>south</category>
      <category>east</category>
      <category>asian</category>
      <category>nations</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>application</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>pp</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>shaun</category>
      <category>lee</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_122</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Hwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T05:23:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "International Arbitration, a Contemporary Perspective" (Lecture delivered in Bologna, 5 June 2008)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_121</link>
      <description>This article examines some of the general features of the current international arbitration system.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>contemporary</category>
      <category>perspective</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>delivered</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>bologna</category>
      <category>june</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_121</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T04:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pierre Lalive "Absolute Finality of Arbitral Awards ?"in Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliaçao-Año I-2008 (Associação Portuguesa de Arbiatragem, Ed. Almedina, Coimbra, 2009), pp. 109-127.</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_120</link>
      <description>In this article, Professor Lalive examines the competing values of finality and correctness of arbitral awards, referring to concrete commercial cases and to the ICSID system.</description>
      <category>pierre</category>
      <category>lalive</category>
      <category>absolute</category>
      <category>finality</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>system</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pierre_Lalive</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-22T04:52:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Treaty Obligations and National Law: Emerging Conflicts in International Arbitration" in 58 Hastings Law Review 251 (2006) (with co-author Alexander Yanos)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_119</link>
      <description>This examination of recent United States case law highlights emerging tensions between treaty obligations and national law in the recognition of arbitral awards.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>treaty</category>
      <category>obligations</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>national</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>emerging</category>
      <category>conflicts</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>hastings</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>co</category>
      <category>author</category>
      <category>alexander</category>
      <category>yanos</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_119</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Respecting the New York Convention" in 18 (2) ICC Court of Arbitration Bulletin 65 (2007)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_118</link>
      <description>This article examines the contours of national respect for the New York Convention by examining recent divergent strands of case law.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>respecting</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>icc</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>bulletin</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_118</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:39:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Comments to the ruling of the Cairo Court of Appeals, 7th Commercial Circuit (12/B), hearing of 9th June 2009" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_117</link>
      <description>This is a case note examining a recent judgment of the Cairo Court of Appeals in setting aside proceedings.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>comments</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>ruling</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>cairo</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>appeals</category>
      <category>th</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>circuit</category>
      <category>b</category>
      <category>hearing</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>th</category>
      <category>june</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_117</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Setting aside an arbitral award with a reference to recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_116</link>
      <description>This is an overview of the grounds for setting aside in Art. 829 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>setting</category>
      <category>aside</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>award</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>reference</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>recent</category>
      <category>judgments</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>cassation</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>forthcoming</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:17:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_116</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:17:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Italian law of arbitration" in Journal on Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_115</link>
      <description>This article provides a succinct overview of the Italian law on arbitration.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>this</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <category>provides</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>succinct</category>
      <category>overview</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>on</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_115</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Giorgio Bernini, "Challenge of an arbitrator, with a reference to recent judgments of the Italian Court of Cassation" in Journal of Arbitration (forthcoming)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_114</link>
      <description>This is a brief note regarding Art. 815 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in three recent decisions of the Italian Court of Cassation.</description>
      <category>giorgio</category>
      <category>bernini</category>
      <category>challenge</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>an</category>
      <category>arbitrator</category>
      <category>with</category>
      <category>a</category>
      <category>reference</category>
      <category>to</category>
      <category>recent</category>
      <category>judgments</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>italian</category>
      <category>court</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>cassation</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>journal</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>forthcoming</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_114</guid>
      <dc:creator>giorgiobernini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:10:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Procedural Default Rules Revisited" in Arbitration Insights 331 (J. Lew &amp; L. Mistels, eds. 2006)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_113</link>
      <description>This article explores three procedural aspects of arbitration practice: the use of professional guidelines, resort to national law to fill gaps and increased awareness of the need for ground rules at the start of proceedings.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>procedural</category>
      <category>default</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>revisited</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>insights</category>
      <category>j</category>
      <category>lew</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>mistels</category>
      <category>eds</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_113</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William W. Park, "Two Faces of Progress: Fairness and Flexibility in Arbitral Procedure" in 23 Arb. Int’l 499 (2007)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_112</link>
      <description>In this article, the author examines two themes in the legal framework of arbitration -- arbitrator discretion and constraint  -- through the prism of Sections 34 and 68 of the English Arbitration Act 1996.</description>
      <category>william</category>
      <category>w</category>
      <category>park</category>
      <category>two</category>
      <category>faces</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>progress</category>
      <category>fairness</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>flexibility</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>procedure</category>
      <category>in</category>
      <category>arb</category>
      <category>int</category>
      <category>l</category>
      <category>prism</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>sections</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>english</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>act</category>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>council</category>
      <category>for</category>
      <category>commercial</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_112</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Park</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T03:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


