<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ICCA Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org</link>
    <description>ICCA Articles</description>
    <dc:creator>ICCA</dc:creator>
    <item>
      <title>International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics?</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_35</link>
      <description>The fact that the mechanism of anti-suit injunctions—in this instance, antiarbitration injunctions—originates from common law systems in no way means that the disruption of the arbitral process is specific to those systems. Courts in civil law...</description>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>emmanuel</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>anti</category>
      <category>suit</category>
      <category>injunctions</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>tribunal</category>
      <category>s</category>
      <category>jurisdiction</category>
      <category>issue</category>
      <category>anti</category>
      <category>suit</category>
      <category>injunctions</category>
      <category>legal</category>
      <category>regime</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>the</category>
      <category>issuance</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>anti</category>
      <category>suit</category>
      <category>injunctions</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:53:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_35</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_Gaillard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-04T12:53:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transnational Law: A Legal System or a Method of Decision Making?</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_34</link>
      <description>AFTER SOME 35 years of legal debate aid countless applications of transnational rules by international arbitrators since far before the debate over the concept even began...remain such a divisive issue&#xD;
in the world of international arbitration</description>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>emmanuel</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>transnational</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>transnational</category>
      <category>rules</category>
      <category>by</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitrators</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_34</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_Gaillard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-04T12:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Meaning of "and" in Article 42(1)</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_33</link>
      <description>Second Sentence, of the Washington Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process</description>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>emmanuel</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>article</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>choice</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>process</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:14:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_33</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_Gaillard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-04T12:14:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_32</link>
      <description>Investments and Investors Covered by the C. Which "Investments" are Protected Under the Treaty?. Which "Investors" are Protected Under the Treaty?</description>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>emmanuel</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>energy</category>
      <category>charter</category>
      <category>treaty</category>
      <category>investments</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>investors</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_32</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_Gaillard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-04T12:08:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Investment Law and Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_31</link>
      <description>Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilatera Treaties and Customary International Law</description>
      <category>icca</category>
      <category>articles</category>
      <category>emmanuel</category>
      <category>gaillard</category>
      <category>cases</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>nafta</category>
      <category>bilatera</category>
      <category>treaties</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>customary</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_31</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emmanuel_Gaillard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-04T11:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enforcement of ICSID Awards</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_30</link>
      <description>This paper discusses the regime for the enforcement of arbitral awards rendered pursuant to the ICSID Convention. The paper also reviews the generally positive record of compliance with ICSID arbitral awards.</description>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>antonio</category>
      <category>parra</category>
      <category>parra</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:55:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_30</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_Parra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T13:55:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Arbitration is not Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_28</link>
      <description>Jan Paulsson delivered the John E.C. Brierley Memorial Lecture at McGill University, Montreal on 28 May 2008.</description>
      <category>jan</category>
      <category>paulsson</category>
      <category>international</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>is</category>
      <category>not</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>john</category>
      <category>e</category>
      <category>c</category>
      <category>brierley</category>
      <category>memorial</category>
      <category>lecture</category>
      <category>mcgill</category>
      <category>university</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_28</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan_Paulsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-20T12:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The draft Dublin Convention 2008 - An explanation of the proposed changes</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_26</link>
      <description>An explanatory note regarding the proposed changes to the New York Convention 1958 as presented by Prof. Dr. Albert Jan van den Berg during the Plenary Session of the ICCA Conference, Dublin, 2008.</description>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>dublin</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>recognition</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>award</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>agreement</category>
      <category>explanatory</category>
      <category>note</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_26</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T14:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The draft Dublin Convention 2008 -  A comparison of the New York Convention 1958 and what is proposed</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_25</link>
      <description>A comparison of the New York Convention 1958 with the proposed revision as proposed by Prof. Dr. Albert Jan van den Berg at the Plenary Session of the ICCA Conference in Dublin, June 2008.</description>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>dublin</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>recognition</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>award</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>agreement</category>
      <category>comparison</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_25</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T14:22:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The draft Dublin Convention 2008 - What the "new" New York Convention could look like...</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_24</link>
      <description>Dubbed the "Dublin Convention 2008" by Teresa Cheng S.C., Prof. Dr. Albert Jan van den Berg's polemic "new" New York Convention 1958, as presented at the Plenary Session of the ICCA Conference in Dublin in June 2008.</description>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>recognition</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>award</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>agreement</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_24</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T14:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Overview of the The New York Convention of 1958</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_23</link>
      <description>This Overview is based on the most recent Commentary (published in Yearbook Vol. XXVIII (2003)) and the more than 1,300 court decisions reported and referenced in the Yearbook.</description>
      <category>recognition</category>
      <category>and</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>foreign</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_23</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-04T14:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New York Convention of 1958: Refusals</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_22</link>
      <description>A review of refusals of enforcement under the New York Convention up to 2007.</description>
      <category>new</category>
      <category>york</category>
      <category>convention</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>refusals</category>
      <category>enforcement</category>
      <category>of</category>
      <category>foreign</category>
      <category>arbitral</category>
      <category>awards</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_22</guid>
      <dc:creator>Albert_Jan_van_den_Berg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-04T13:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration</title>
      <link>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_20</link>
      <description>Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration</description>
      <category>investor</category>
      <category>state</category>
      <category>arbitration</category>
      <category>icsid</category>
      <category>applicable</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.arbitration-icca.org/articles.html#articolo_20</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_Parra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-19T12:42:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

